Talk:Jane Hook/@comment-86.179.227.183-20150308195248/@comment-14800267-20150310120511


 * massages temples* Ah, here we go again. It's a "Morally Offended Random Outraged by Nudity". Yet again.

Well, you can thik whatever the hell you want but I'm not removing them. Why? Well...

Where do we start? Shall I begin at how sexualizing a female body and treating it as something you should protect the precious, delicate eyes of children from is actually perpetuating the objectification of women? It's fuelling body shame and violence again women all over by programming it into kids from a young age by making the nude form a shameful thing? Men are perfectly fine topless, but women are supposed to be hidden? That showing skin is instantly inappropriate and sexualised? A concept which feeds rape culture?

I'm a Pin Up artist. I have a Burlesque art series and I work towards using pin up art AS A FEMALE ARTIST to encourage positivity and body acceptance. If cleavage is encouraged and perfectly acceptable, why isn't "underboob?" If seeing a man naked from behind or with strategic objects in the way is used as a comedic device, why are women always always sexualised when they're naked, even with thesame kind of objects strategically in the way?

You can take your morality police elsewhere thanks. You see worse and more revealing things in HUGE poster sized underwear ads in the window of stores in the mall, you see them on comic covers, videogames and even goddamn ads for common products. Deoderant. Cars. Even damned burgers and in some cases, they're openly objectifying and sexualizing. Why are the two pieces, one humour and one an effing monster "inappropriate" where these other things are so ingrained in our culture we no longer even notice?

On the off chance you'e NOT referring to the partial nudity, and you're referring to the Lizzie and Jane slash then, 1) It wasn't my idea, but I thought it was cute and rolled with it, and 2) Get off my page. Get off my page right now.